Re: pg_dumpall and version confusion - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: pg_dumpall and version confusion
Date
Msg-id 45F9DBF6.10304@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_dumpall and version confusion  (Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org>)
Responses Re: pg_dumpall and version confusion  (Tony Caduto <tony_caduto@amsoftwaredesign.com>)
List pgsql-general
Dave Page wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> I have *no* interest in trying to get it to support an --output-version
>> switch...
>
> There speaks a man who has the luxury of not having to worry about
> multi-version admin tools :-(

I am afraid that I have to agree with Tom here. Pg_dump has plenty of
other deficiencies let's not add to complexity by having an
--output-version.

If you want that, create a wrapper program that calls to different
statically compiled versions of pg_dump.

Joshua D. Drake


>
> /D
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
>
>               http://archives.postgresql.org/
>


--

      === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
             http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Paul Lambert
Date:
Subject: Re: PgSql on Vista?
Next
From: "Jasbinder Singh Bali"
Date:
Subject: exception handling in plperlu