Markus Schiltknecht wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Walter Cruz wrote:
>> Have anyone seen this?
>>
>> http://devloop.org.uk/documentation/database-performance/
>
> Looks like a good, well documented benchmark. Was well worth the read.
> Probably even more if you're more into Java than I am.
>
> What's surprising me is, that PostgreSQL often was 'only marginally
> slower' compared to MySQL. First, I thought: wow, MySQL must have
> improved. But later on, I've read that they tested the MyISAM storage
> engine. Thus, I'm surprised that
>
> a) they perform only marginally better, and
>
> b) that the results are so close and similar.
>
> I can only conclude, that PostgreSQL does a very well job in keeping the
> costs of consistency very low. ;-)
Or:
We Rock!
Joshua D. Drake
>
> Regards
>
> Markus
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
