Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to write a plpgsql function for use as a
> BEFORE ... EACH ROW function. I want to modify
> other tables even when the function returns NULL
> and therefore the table on which the BEFORE
> trigger is defined is not updated.
> Sorry for being paranoid about this but I
> want to double check before relying on
> behavior that few people probably use.
I think it's fairly common, actually. Returning NULL is cancelling the
update *of that row* rather than aborting the transaction, so all
side-effects should always survive.
Otherwise you couldn't update 100 rows and just skip one or two by
returning NULL from a before trigger.
--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd
