Re: Wikipedia on Postgres (was Re: postgresql vs mysql) - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: Wikipedia on Postgres (was Re: postgresql vs mysql)
Date
Msg-id 45DE41B7.5090009@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Wikipedia on Postgres (was Re: postgresql vs mysql)  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: Wikipedia on Postgres (was Re: postgresql vs mysql)  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-general
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake escribió:
>> Andrej Ricnik-Bay wrote:
>>> On 2/23/07, Jim Nasby <decibel@decibel.org> wrote:
>>>> That depends greatly on what you're doing with it. Generally, as soon
>>>> as you start throwing a multi-user workload at it, MySQL stops
>>>> scaling. http://tweakers.net recently did a study on that.
>>> I think I recall that wikipedia uses MySQL ... they get quite a few
>>> hits, too, I believe.
>> And outages if you watch :)
>
> Does this mean that we believe the Wikipedia would not suffer any
> outages if it ran on Postgres?

I believe it would suffer less outage yes.

>
> How is the Postgres port of the Wikipedia doing this days anyway?  Is it
> in a shape where one would consider it "competitive"?

I don't know, I believe citizideum or whatever it is called is
PostgreSQL based.

Joshua D. Drake

>


--

      === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
             http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Glen Parker
Date:
Subject: Re: postgresql vs mysql
Next
From: Ron Johnson
Date:
Subject: Re: postgresql vs mysql