Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: SCMS question - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Markus Schiltknecht
Subject Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: SCMS question
Date
Msg-id 45DDC702.4060205@bluegap.ch
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SCMS question  (Markus Schiltknecht <markus@bluegap.ch>)
Responses Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: SCMS question  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: SCMS question  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: SCMS question  (Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker <richard@levitte.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hello Richard,

you should probably have read the thread on the PostgreSQL -hackers 
mailing list I've linked to... at least you didn't make Tom's point ;-)

Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
>   1. Do you want to stay with CVS or do you want to move to something
>      else?

Most PostgreSQL developers currently want to stay with CVS. Only some 
desperate souls including myself are fiddling with other VCSes.

>   3. What would you want a replacement to be able to do?

That's being debated, with many voices saying: CVS (plus our own 
hackery) provides all we need.  (And be warned again: as soon as you 
point out an advantage of your favourite VCS, you're making Tom's point. 
;-) )

> So far, I'm getting the sense that there are a lot of opinions on what
> replacement system to use, a bit carelessly before having answered the
> above questions thoroughly.

How did you get that impression? I'm currently *using* monotone for 
Postgres-R development, doing cvs_import and propagating to my branch. 
And I know others did the same already, too.

Regards

Markus



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD"
Date:
Subject: Re: Column storage positions
Next
From: "Florian G. Pflug"
Date:
Subject: Re: What is CheckPoint.undo needed for?