-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 01/29/07 16:05, tom wrote:
> No.
> Postgres does not represent an economic entity that can compete for $$
> with Oracle.
>
> It's also not nearly as popular. And I mean that in a very pop-culture
> way.
> How long did it take Oracle to support Linux? Only when it became
> "pop"ular to do so.
>
> Who would they target anyways?
> There's no one company....
They could buy out CommandPrompt and EnterpriseDB...
The buyouts wouldn't *kill* pg, but they would wound it mightily.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFFvnRGS9HxQb37XmcRAjA7AJ96LsBV2af16AjNcuSMLnQT6TvhmgCdESzN
17BSJ6ujxPwkebKwCbBEuy4=
=kZ5Q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
