pg_ctl options - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject pg_ctl options
Date
Msg-id 459BB9BA.1010502@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: pg_ctl options
Re: pg_ctl options
List pgsql-hackers
I notice that quite a few pg_ctl options have no long form equivalents, 
namely these: NopPwW

Also, none of the long forms seems to be documented at all.

Should this be cleared up (maybe a nice first project for lurking new 
contributors)?\

If we don't want long forms for some reason, then a comment in the code 
saying why would make sense.

cheers

andrew


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD"
Date:
Subject: Re: effective_cache_size vs units
Next
From: Florian Weimer
Date:
Subject: Re: TODO: GNU TLS