Re: pg_ctl options - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: pg_ctl options
Date
Msg-id 200701062218.l06MIXW06453@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to pg_ctl options  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: pg_ctl options  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Added to TODO:

* Make consistent use of long/short command options --- pg_ctl needs long ones, pg_config doesn't have short ones,
postgresdoesn't have enough long ones, etc.
 


---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> 
> I notice that quite a few pg_ctl options have no long form equivalents, 
> namely these: NopPwW
> 
> Also, none of the long forms seems to be documented at all.
> 
> Should this be cleared up (maybe a nice first project for lurking new 
> contributors)?\
> 
> If we don't want long forms for some reason, then a comment in the code 
> saying why would make sense.
> 
> cheers
> 
> andrew
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
> 
>                http://archives.postgresql.org

--  Bruce Momjian   bruce@momjian.us EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com
 + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Mark/Restore and avoiding RandomAccess sorts
Next
From: Oleg Bartunov
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PGCon 2007 Program Committee