Re: Linux vs. FreeBSD - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Ron Johnson
Subject Re: Linux vs. FreeBSD
Date
Msg-id 455456E4.9030809@cox.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Linux vs. FreeBSD  (Enrico <scotty@linuxtime.it>)
Responses Re: Linux vs. FreeBSD  (Enrico <scotty@linuxtime.it>)
List pgsql-general
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 11/10/06 02:24, Enrico wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Nov 2006 10:12:57 -0600
> "Bart McFarling" <bartm@iilogistics.com> wrote:
>
>> We are installing a new Postgresql server, it will not run anything else
>> but postgresql. We are currently looking at moving from a RHEL 4.0
>> system to FreeBSD.
>>
>> Does one OS offer better performace over the other when running
>> postgresql?
>>
>
> I had best performance on FreeBSD with his file system.
>
> Look at this link.
> http://www.postgresql.org/files/documentation/books/aw_pgsql/hw_performance/node11.html

Is this still accurate 3.75 years later?

- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA  USA

Is "common sense" really valid?
For example, it is "common sense" to white-power racists that
whites are superior to blacks, and that those with brown skins
are mud people.
However, that "common sense" is obviously wrong.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFVFbjS9HxQb37XmcRAiAsAKDkVN/WpHGyNIL8edGgjCk9XXu/BQCgxvwH
O0LOcYc2YJMhh7Tkxe6fouU=
=KAaz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Shane Ambler
Date:
Subject: Re: postgres at startup
Next
From: "Anton Melser"
Date:
Subject: "stopping" a single database in a cluster