Re: Pgsql on Solaris - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Richard Huxton
Subject Re: Pgsql on Solaris
Date
Msg-id 45486089.3090507@archonet.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Pgsql on Solaris  (<vodhner@cox.net>)
List pgsql-general
vodhner@cox.net wrote:
> Thanks to all who replied.
>
> The reason I wanted to go 64-bit on our Fujitsu sparc-alikes was that
> our sysadmins switched to 64-bit Perl as part of the standard
> package, and that broke our DBD::Pg interface.  With no warning, we
> started getting a message about Pg.so, "Wrong ELF Class:
> ELFCLASS32".
>
> My assumption had been that 64-bit was the latest and greatest, so of
> course config should have found the appropriate libraries etc. and
> set me up for a 64-bit make.  The answer to my question seems to be
> yes, I could cause 64-bit compilation, but it's not the obvious way
> to go.

You only need the client libraries as 64-bit for this particular problem
. Of course, if server and client are on the same machine then it's
probably simpler to have everything the same.

--
   Richard Huxton
   Archonet Ltd

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Compiling/Installing as a non-admin user
Next
From: Richard Huxton
Date:
Subject: Re: Trouble with plpgsql generic trigger function using