Re: Closing some 8.4 open items - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Closing some 8.4 open items
Date
Msg-id 4524.1239477159@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Closing some 8.4 open items  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Responses Re: Closing some 8.4 open items  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
> Tom,
> It fits into 80 columns if you don't have any functions with 11 
> parameters.  ;-)

Well, yeah, but in typical cases I think it fits.  A look at the current
regression database shows all but 6 of 117 functions fitting.  With
another ten characters eaten by a new column, a lot more of them would
wrap.

> Actually, I'm thinking the new column ought to be called "type".

Yes, that's what I had in mind too.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: Unicode string literals versus the world
Next
From: David Fetter
Date:
Subject: Re: Closing some 8.4 open items