Re: RAID 0 not as fast as expected - Mailing list pgsql-performance

Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 16, 2006 at 04:46:04PM -0700, Luke Lonergan wrote:
>> Yes.  What's pretty large?  We've had to redefine large recently, now we're
>> talking about systems with between 100TB and 1,000TB.
>
> Do you actually have PostgreSQL databases in that size range?

No, they have databases in MPP that are that large :)

Joshua D. Drake


>
> /* Steinar */


--

    === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
    Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
              http://www.commandprompt.com/