Re: RAID 0 not as fast as expected - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Steinar H. Gunderson
Subject Re: RAID 0 not as fast as expected
Date
Msg-id 20060917000843.GA16058@uio.no
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: RAID 0 not as fast as expected  ("Luke Lonergan" <llonergan@greenplum.com>)
Responses Re: RAID 0 not as fast as expected
List pgsql-performance
On Sat, Sep 16, 2006 at 04:46:04PM -0700, Luke Lonergan wrote:
> Yes.  What's pretty large?  We've had to redefine large recently, now we're
> talking about systems with between 100TB and 1,000TB.

Do you actually have PostgreSQL databases in that size range?

/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Luke Lonergan"
Date:
Subject: Re: RAID 0 not as fast as expected
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: RAID 0 not as fast as expected