D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 07:59:07 -0700
> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:
>> D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
>>> For years I have been promising that a 64 bit version of the money type
>>> was on the way. Here it is. So far it compiles and I have done some
>>> basic testing on it and it seems to work fine. Note that the currency
>>> symbol is also dropped on output as well but it is accepted on input.
>> Not to come down on your hard work, but isn't the money type deprecated?
>
> Not by me. :-)
Obviously ;), but it is deprecated by the project.
>
> The biggest argument about the money type is that it has an unrealistic
> limit. With this change we can go to almost one hundred thousand
> trillion dollars. That should handle even the US federal budget for a
> few more years.
Isn't that what numeric is for?
>
> The benefit of the money type is speed. Because internal operations
> are done on integers they can generally be handled by single CPU ops.
> My tests on the 64 bit version show 10% to 25% improvement over numeric
> for many operations.
Well that is certainly cool :) I will leave it to others to determine if
we should include it.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL
solutionssince 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
