Re: Syntax for converting double to a timestamp - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Alban Hertroys
Subject Re: Syntax for converting double to a timestamp
Date
Msg-id 44FBF9C8.8080408@magproductions.nl
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Syntax for converting double to a timestamp  (Michael Glaesemann <grzm@seespotcode.net>)
Responses Re: Syntax for converting double to a timestamp  ("Frank Church" <voipfc@googlemail.com>)
List pgsql-general
Michael Glaesemann wrote:
> Note that epoch does not mean 1900-01-01 00:00:00.

Indeed! Where did this 1900 sneak in? Aren't timestamps usually based on
epoch?

--
Alban Hertroys
alban@magproductions.nl

magproductions b.v.

T: ++31(0)534346874
F: ++31(0)534346876
M:
I: www.magproductions.nl
A: Postbus 416
    7500 AK Enschede

// Integrate Your World //

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Alban Hertroys
Date:
Subject: Re: Training (from Thought provoking...)
Next
From: "Philippe Lang"
Date:
Subject: Plperl functions with OUT parameters crashing each other when used in the same connection