Re: Postgres tracking - the pgtrack project - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: Postgres tracking - the pgtrack project
Date
Msg-id 44FA2BD7.6040208@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Postgres tracking - the pgtrack project  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: Postgres tracking - the pgtrack project  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
>   
>> There are a number of reasons for this, not least of which is the
>> enormous and ever-changing requirements such a system would have to
>> have.
>>     
>
>   
>> The buildfarm is an excellent example of this.
>>     
>
> The build farm is not an example of this.  There isn't any build-farm 
> software out there.  There is, however, plenty of issue tracking 
> software out there.
>
> Just pointing that out.  Have at it.  I for one would rather set up 
> existing issue trackers and work with them.  If I could just find 
> hardware to host it.  Not that I've looked, though.
>
>   

What is more, a good bug tracking system is orders of magnitude more 
complex that the buildfarm.

If we want something sooner rather than later, let's use something off 
the shelf and tailor it.

cheers

andrew


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Change FETCH/MOVE to use int8.
Next
From: Andreas Pflug
Date:
Subject: Re: Autovacuum on by default?