>> we will know whether this is a great thing we should continue, or we
>> should stick to our traditional laissez-faire style of project
>> management. I figure that even if it really sucks, it wouldn't kill us
>> to try it for one release cycle --- at the very worst, we'd make up lost
>> time in future by no longer needing to waste bandwidth arguing about it.
>
> Would this be a core postgresql code roadmap or something a bit
> broader (contrib, custom types, GUI-ish stuff, utilities and what
> have you)?
I think that we could at this time only expect things that would be
submitted for core inclusion. The less cats to herd the better :)
Joshua D. Drake
>
> Cheers,
> Steve
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL
solutionssince 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
