Re: Practical maximums (was Re: PostgreSQL theoretical - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Ron Johnson
Subject Re: Practical maximums (was Re: PostgreSQL theoretical
Date
Msg-id 44D7B66B.6090505@cox.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Practical maximums (was Re: PostgreSQL theoretical  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: Practical maximums (was Re: PostgreSQL theoretical  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
List pgsql-general
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
>
>> This is where a multi-threaded pg_tapedump would be more effective,
>> since it would be able to, for example, have 4 threads reading
>> (different parts of) the database and writing to 4 separate tape drives.
>
> It will be difficult to have a consistent dump though.  You can't do
> that with separate transactions.  (And you can't have multiple
> simultaneous readers without separate transactions.)

Absolutely, you're right.  All "threads" must run from within the
same read-only transaction.


- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA  USA

Is "common sense" really valid?
For example, it is "common sense" to white-power racists that
whites are superior to blacks, and that those with brown skins
are mud people.
However, that "common sense" is obviously wrong.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFE17ZrS9HxQb37XmcRAitSAKCo1/HaJ8ZsoGYFgGo2sHezWmqqWACbB9Mr
Hw4Xaalah+ZqExMwr4vu058=
=e33c
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Ron Johnson
Date:
Subject: Re: Practical maximums (was Re: PostgreSQL theoretical
Next
From: Ron Johnson
Date:
Subject: Re: Practical maximums (was Re: PostgreSQL theoretical