Re: Best Procedural Language? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: Best Procedural Language?
Date
Msg-id 44D0C6CB.9060401@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Best Procedural Language?  ("Carlo Stonebanks" <stonec.register@sympatico.ca>)
List pgsql-general
Carlo Stonebanks wrote:
>> plPHP is not as mature as plTcl (or is that plTclng). However it is very
>> well developed and maintained. Heck, companies are even holding talks and
>> training classes on it now.
>
> What is lacking in plPHP? To be honest, even though I am a Tcl developer I
> would rather develop in PHP, and I know next to NOTHING about PHP!

There are some known issues that cause it to crash, you can see the
project site for an example.

Also it requires the apache apxs stuff which doesn't make it the most
portable.

We are looking at ways to make it not have the apache requirement.

Joshua D. Drake


--

    === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
    Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
              http://www.commandprompt.com/



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: Best Procedural Language?
Next
From: Kenneth Downs
Date:
Subject: Re: Best Procedural Language?