Re: GUI Interface - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Thomas Hallgren
Subject Re: GUI Interface
Date
Msg-id 4465854B.6080401@tada.se
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: GUI Interface  (Dan Armbrust <daniel.armbrust.list@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
Dan Armbrust wrote:
> You live in an interesting world... meanwhile, I'm here in the real
> world, using Eclipse - the best IDE I've ever used to develop java
> applications.  Oh, wait, Eclipse is written in Java?  I didn't think it
> was possible to write good apps in java?  Certainly better than visual
> studio (and yes, I have to use both - eclipse is a far better IDE in my
> opinion).  Oh, and I can run eclipse on my linux desktop as well as my
> windows desktop?  Thats just cool.  Oh, and my next machine?  Definitely
> a Mac.  And it woks there too - just like all of my SWT apps do.
>
> I will admit, it is rather easy to write slow java swing applications
> There are a lot of poor ones out there.   Its a shame that Sun botched
> swing so badly, and have never repaired it properly.  Its not impossible
> to write fast, responsive apps in swing, it just takes skilled
> developers.  And its a pain.
>
> However, now with the emergence of SWT and modern JVM's - there is no
> reason for your java GUI to be any slower than anything else.  The only
> excuse for a slow java app these days is the quality of the code that it
> is built with.  And you can write a bad, slow app in any language.
>
Cool. At least one that actually knows what he's talking about and have real life
experience. I'm also using Eclipse and a slew of other Java apps. No complaints whatsoever
on performance. Not too happy about all C/C++ apps that crash on illegal memory access though...

+1 (or 10) for Java on the desktop.

I will not spend time on a war that cannot be fought in this forum. Just wanted to air my
opinion this once :-)

Regards,
Thomas Hallgren


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Hallgren
Date:
Subject: Re: GUI Interface
Next
From: "Dave Page"
Date:
Subject: Re: GUI Interface