Re: bad performance on Solaris 10 - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Jignesh K. Shah
Subject Re: bad performance on Solaris 10
Date
Msg-id 443DAF1D.6090007@sun.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: bad performance on Solaris 10  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: bad performance on Solaris 10  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: bad performance on Solaris 10  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-performance
Bruce,

Hard to answer that... People like me who know and love PostgreSQL and
Solaris finds this as an opportunity to make their favorite database
work best on their favorite operating system.

Many times PostgreSQL has many things based on assumption that it will
run on  Linux and it is left to Solaris to emulate that behavior.That
said there are ways to improve performance even on UFS on Solaris, it
just requires more tweaks.

Hopefully this will lead to few Solaris friendly default values  like
fsync/odatasync :-)

Regards,
Jignesh


Bruce Momjian wrote:

>
>It is hard to imagine why people spend so much time modifying Sun
>machines run with acceptable performance when non-Sun operating systems
>work fine without such hurtles.
>
>

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Craig A. James"
Date:
Subject: Re: FOREIGN KEYS vs PERFORMANCE
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Sun Fire T2000 and PostgreSQL 8.1.3