What's with this lib suffix? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Hallgren
Subject What's with this lib suffix?
Date
Msg-id 44004AF4.8000608@tada.se
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: What's with this lib suffix?
List pgsql-hackers
I have a PL/Java bug entry from Peter E. that reads "It is customary in PostgreSQL land and 
elsewhere, that dynamically loadable modules do not have a lib prefix (compare plpgsql.so, 
pltcl.so, etc.).  So I suggest that the shared object installed by PL/Java also be called 
exactly pljava.so.".

I'd like to follow customary practices but as it turns out, I'm not the one adding the 'lib' 
prefix. It's done by the Makefile.shlib that comes bundled with pgxs. Here you can read 
things like:
 # Default shlib naming convention used by the majority of platforms shlib        =
lib$(NAME)$(DLSUFFIX).$(SO_MAJOR_VERSION).$(SO_MINOR_VERSION)shlib_major    = lib$(NAME)$(DLSUFFIX).$(SO_MAJOR_VERSION)
shlib_bare   = lib$(NAME)$(DLSUFFIX)
 

and sure enough, that's what gets used too. So what goes?

Personally, I'd prefer to keep the 'lib' prefix since it really *is* the default naming 
convention on all *n[iu]x platforms I've been in contact with. Not so on Windows though so 
perhaps that should change in Makefile.shlib?

I'm confused.

Kind Regards,
Thomas Hallgren


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Hannu Krosing
Date:
Subject: Re: Pl/Python -- current maintainer?
Next
From: Martin Pitt
Date:
Subject: Re: Adding an ignore list to pg_restore, prototype patch #1