Re: Adding an ignore list to pg_restore, prototype patch #1 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Martin Pitt
Subject Re: Adding an ignore list to pg_restore, prototype patch #1
Date
Msg-id 20060225124648.GA6968@piware.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Adding an ignore list to pg_restore, prototype patch #1  (Martin Pitt <mpitt@debian.org>)
Responses Re: Adding an ignore list to pg_restore, prototype p.tch #1
Re: Adding an ignore list to pg_restore, prototype patch #1
Re: Adding an ignore list to pg_restore, prototype patch #1
List pgsql-hackers
Hi again,

Martin Pitt [2006-02-19 14:39 +0100]:
> Since this changes the behaviour of pg_restore, this should probably
> become an option, e. g. -D / --ignore-existing-table-data. I'll do
> this if you agree to the principle of the current patch.

I improved the patch now to only ignore TABLE DATA for existing tables
if '-X ignore-existing-tables' is specified. I also updated the
documentation.

Since this doesn't change the default behaviour now any more, I would
like to put this patch into the Debian packages to provide automatic
upgrades for PostGIS-enabled databases (see [1]). Does anyone object
to this?

Do you consider to adopt this upstream?

Thanks in advance, and have a nice weekend!

Martin

[1] http://bugs.debian.org/351571

--
Martin Pitt        http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer   http://www.ubuntu.com
Debian Developer   http://www.debian.org

In a world without walls and fences, who needs Windows and Gates?

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Hallgren
Date:
Subject: What's with this lib suffix?
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: What's with this lib suffix?