Re: ScanDirections - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Russell Smith
Subject Re: ScanDirections
Date
Msg-id 43F91931.5040508@pws.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ScanDirections  (James William Pye <pgsql@jwp.name>)
List pgsql-patches
James William Pye wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 08:02:09PM -0500, Neil Conway wrote:
>
>>Why?
>
>
> *Very* minor. one byte instead of four.

Is one byte any faster anyway?

I would be expecting that with 64bit PC's a 64bit item is as fast, if
not faster than a 32bit, or 8 bit.
>
> Yes, not really worth the time, but I was poking around at code anyways and
> decided to write up a little patch.


pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: James William Pye
Date:
Subject: Re: ScanDirections
Next
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: ScanDirections