Re: ScanDirections - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Neil Conway
Subject Re: ScanDirections
Date
Msg-id 1140398491.2615.39.camel@localhost.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ScanDirections  (James William Pye <pgsql@jwp.name>)
Responses Re: ScanDirections
List pgsql-patches
On Sun, 2006-02-19 at 18:12 -0700, James William Pye wrote:
> *Very* minor. one byte instead of four.

Arguably, enumerations are more readable than #defines and easier to
debug. Why do we care about saving 3 bytes for ScanDirection?

-Neil



pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Russell Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: ScanDirections
Next
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: plpython: fix memory leak