Dave Page wrote:
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Devrim GUNDUZ [mailto:devrim@commandprompt.com]
> Sent: Wed 2/15/2006 12:50 PM
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Joshua D. Drake; Tom Lane; pgsql-www@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Search machine is ready
>
>
>> Dave, why don't you use the vendor packages? I believe Joshua will use
>> Fedora Core, and I'd use vendor Apache, etc.
>>
>
> I was assuming Debian - I could have sworn he mentioned apt at some point.
>
Well FYI if we were using Fedora, we would probably use apt anyway ;)
That being said... It is Ubuntu Breezy.
> - Vendor changes. I don't like to run packages I know to have been changed by the vendor - for example, it was noted
theother day that the Debian PostgreSQL packages contains patches that aren't in PGDG releases. In this case the only
OSvendor I would trust with a modified PostgreSQL is Red Hat, for fairly obvious reasons.
>
The search machine currently has MammothPostgreSQL FOSS on it. Which is
pure PostgreSQL.
>
>> As a part of WWW team and CMD, I'd be happy to coordinate the stuff,
>> BTW.
>>
>
> Please feel free :-)
>
> Regards,Dave.
>
--
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: PLphp, PLperl - http://www.commandprompt.com/
