Robert Treat wrote:
> On Saturday 11 February 2006 10:50, Robert Treat wrote:
>
>> I've recieved a submission of some postgresql related web graphics that I
>> was planning to add to the graphics repository. While I was uploading them
>> the thought hit me that we might have a problem with some of these. First
>> two examples of ones that are ok:
>>
>> http://xzilla.postgresql.org/layout/images/2_160x600.gif
>> http://xzilla.postgresql.org/layout/images/14_160x600.gif
>>
>> both very nice and wonderful, but I am wondering about this one:
>>
>> http://xzilla.postgresql.org/layout/images/15_160x600.gif
>>
>> It uses the "photo elephant" which I not sure what the license status is.
>> The relevant link in the archives seems to be
>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-www/2004-12/msg00290.php
>> but it is less than definitive since we would not be using these images on
>> the postgresql website per say, they would be out in the wild (though under
>> a cc license). I have about a dozen more of these using the "photo
>> elephant" so before I put them up, can I get an ok from someone?
>>
>
> So I guess given no response in 48 hours, I should assume that these photos
> are legally poisoned? In that case can we get a new elephant photo that we
> can use on the website and in web buttons? Joshua, you mentioned something
> way back when about making a replacement pic, how about now?
>
Are you speaking to this Joshua?
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: PLphp, PLperl - http://www.commandprompt.com/
