Adam Biser wrote:
>> This may be off topic for this list, but if you need the OLE DB
>> interface, why not use PgOleDb instead?
>
>
> Tried, it didn't seem to work with it either. The ODBC interface
> seemed to be more active, so I tried here first. :)
You mean the driver's development seemed more active :-)
Sadly, you are correct. I would still appreciate a note sent to the OLE
DB list, just so the problem is documented.
Shachar
