Re: Overriding the optimizer - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Craig A. James
Subject Re: Overriding the optimizer
Date
Msg-id 43A229F3.20200@modgraph-usa.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Overriding the optimizer  (Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>)
List pgsql-performance
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> I don't necessarily disagree with your assertion that we need planner
> hints, but unless you or someone else is willing to submit a patch with
> the feature it's unlikely to ever be implemented...

Now that's an answer I understand and appreciate.  Open-source development relies on many volunteers, and I've
benefittedfrom it since the early 1980's when emacs and Common Lisp first came to my attention.  I've even written a
widely-circulatedarticle about open-source development, which some of you may have read: 

 http://www.moonviewscientific.com/essays/software_lifecycle.htm

I hope nobody here thinks I'm critical of all the hard work that's been put into Postgres.  My hope is to raise the
awarenessof this issue in the hope that it's at least put on "the list" for serious consideration. 

Craig


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Christopher Kings-Lynne
Date:
Subject: Re: Overriding the optimizer
Next
From: "Craig A. James"
Date:
Subject: Re: Overriding the optimizer