Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Mark Kirkwood wrote:
>
>>Simon Riggs wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>I like this, but not because I want to read it myself, but because I
>>>want to make autovacuum responsible for re-allocating free space when it
>>>runs out. This way we can have an autoFSM feature in 8.2
>>>
>>>
>>
>>Not wanting to denigrate value of the interesting but slightly OT
>>direction this thread has taken - but does anybody want to
>>comment/review the patch itself :-) ....?
>
>
> I saw this question about a transaction block and your reply:
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2005-10/msg00226.php
>
> but no new patch. I know someone suggested pgfoundry but it seems most
> natural in /contrib. Do you want to update the patch?
>
In the expectation of further revisions, I was going to batch that one
in with the 'rest' - given that there have not been any, I'll submit a
revised patch.
Cheers
Mark
