Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Use a bitmask to represent role attributes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Use a bitmask to represent role attributes
Date
Msg-id 4356.1419364349@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Use a bitmask to represent role attributes  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes:
> It would be great to figure out a way to get feedback like this earlier
> on in the development.  This patch has been floating around for quite a
> while, with intentional breaks for feedback taken prior to incremental
> improvements and documentation additions.  Clearly that gets back to the
> discussion around the commitfest situation.

Yeah.  Again, I apologize for having ignored the role-attributes thread
for a long time ... but it's not a topic I have any great interest in
personally, and frankly the -hackers traffic volume has gotten to the
point where I *can't* follow every thread.  I think most of us are in
that boat actually.  Not sure if there's anything to be done about it.

(It would help some if more people paid attention to not wasting their
readers' time, eg by trimming quotes rather than reposting the entirety
of some thread in order to add a paragraph here and there.  But I fear
email etiquette is getting to be a lost art.)
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: José Luis Tallón
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal: two new role attributes and/or capabilities?
Next
From: David G Johnston
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Use a bitmask to represent role attributes