Re: pg_autovacuum exceptions question - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pg_autovacuum exceptions question
Date
Msg-id 4346.1250531027@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_autovacuum exceptions question  (Chris Bowlby <excalibur@accesswave.ca>)
List pgsql-general
Chris Bowlby <excalibur@accesswave.ca> writes:
>  Thanks for the response. I've run into situations where the database
> has also been removed just before pg_autovacuum was about to check, and
> there by kicks out an error (mainly an aesthetic issue, not really a
> functional issue).

That was fixed some time ago.  It's not an argument for adding a
"feature" like this.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Nuno Mota
Date:
Subject: Re: plpython return setof and yield
Next
From: Bob Gobeille
Date:
Subject: Re: psql command line editor