Re: Postgres TR for missing chunk - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Postgres TR for missing chunk
Date
Msg-id 4308.1418748920@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Postgres TR for missing chunk  (Jaime Casanova <jaime@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Postgres TR for missing chunk  (M Tarkeshwar Rao <m.tarkeshwar.rao@ericsson.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Jaime Casanova <jaime@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> You know, that toast table name ringed a bell.
> Look at this thread maybe this is your problem, and if it is then is
> already fixed and you should update.
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/12138.1336019219@sss.pgh.pa.us

That was about transient failures though, not persistent ones,
which is what the OP seems to be claiming he's getting.

> Btw, when giving a bug report you should start but saying your PostgreSQL's
> version and explain what you did based on Google's "wisdom"

Yeah.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [Bug] Inconsistent result for inheritance and FOR UPDATE.
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [Bug] Inconsistent result for inheritance and FOR UPDATE.