Re: static libperl? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: static libperl?
Date
Msg-id 430285A7.8040700@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: static libperl?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:

>Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>  
>
>>/usr/bin/ld: /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.6.1/mach/CORE/libperl.a(perl.o): relocation R_X86_64_32S can not be used when
makinga shared object; recompile with -fPIC
 
>>    
>>
>
>  
>
>>Does that mean that we are attempting to link against a static libperl.a?
>>I thought we were supposed to inhibit that.
>>    
>>
>
>Platypus is freebsd though, and we now think we don't need shared
>libraries on that platform:
>http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/makefiles/Makefile.freebsd.diff?r1=1.19;r2=1.20
>
>I am wondering if the issue is that you need -fPIC and libperl was only
>made with -fpic.
>
>It could be that platypus was only passing before because it didn't try
>to build plperl.
>
>    
>  
>

Yeah. I thought we didn't want to link large static libraries into the 
backend, regardless of other issues, but I guess I should have read the 
makefile more closely.

cheers

andrew


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: More handles for BGWriter?
Next
From: Christopher Kings-Lynne
Date:
Subject: Re: pl/Ruby, deprecating plPython and Core