> I think you should take a closer look at PL/Java for the following reasons:
>
> 1. The number of followers of the Java language is extremely high and
> increasing.
> 2. Oracle and DB2 offers Java as a procedural language. You make
> transisitions easy.
> 3. There's a SQL standard for the mapping between the SQL and Java
> language.
> 4. Middle-tier code is often written in Java and can often be moved to
> functions and stored procedures without a rewrite.
> 5. PL/Java already provide both trusted and untrusted language handlers.
> 6. PL/Java has a community of over 70 members and increasing.
> 7. PL/Java has no license issue.
> 8. The author of PL/Java would be happy to maintain it in core.
These are all very good reasons. I would honestly have to know more
about how PL/Java works to make a decision.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
> Regards,
> Thomas Hallgren
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
--
Your PostgreSQL solutions company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Programming, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/
