Re: [PROPOSAL] Shared Ispell dictionaries - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tomas Vondra
Subject Re: [PROPOSAL] Shared Ispell dictionaries
Date
Msg-id 42b1ded6-fd44-5975-77e4-72ada1f134a2@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PROPOSAL] Shared Ispell dictionaries  (Arthur Zakirov <a.zakirov@postgrespro.ru>)
Responses Re: [PROPOSAL] Shared Ispell dictionaries  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 1/17/19 3:15 PM, Arthur Zakirov wrote:
> I attached files of new version of the patch, I applied your tweaks.
> 
>> XXX All dictionaries, but only when there's invalid dictionary?
> 
> I've made a little optimization. I introduced hashvalue into
> TSDictionaryCacheEntry. Now released only DSM of altered or dropped
> dictionaries.
> 
>>  > /* XXX not really a pointer, so the name is misleading */
>>
>> I think we don't need DictPointerData struct anymore, because only
>> ts_dict_shmem_release function needs it (see comments above) and we only
>> need it to hash search. I'll move all fields of DictPointerData to
>> TsearchDictKey struct.
> 
> I was wrong, DictInitData also needs DictPointerData. I didn't remove
> DictPointerData, I renamed it to DictEntryData. Hope that it is a more
> appropriate name.
> 

Thanks. I've reviewed v17 today and I haven't discovered any new issues
so far. If everything goes fine and no one protests, I plan to get it
committed over the next week or so.

regards

-- 
Tomas Vondra                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Chapman Flack
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs SQL/XML Standards
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Shared Ispell dictionaries