Re: distributed performance testing - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: distributed performance testing
Date
Msg-id 42FE7712.2060705@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: distributed performance testing  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:

>Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>  
>
>>Incidentally,  use of a different SCM system might well make 
>>constructing test sets more simple. Imagine, say, in SVN, you would 
>>create a branch called "test-set-yyyy-mm-dd" or some such, make your 
>>changes there, add a test script under some well known name, and commit 
>>the branch.
>>    
>>
>
>This seems a pretty unconvincing argument for SVN ... we could perfectly
>well do that in CVS, no?
>
>            
>  
>

You could well be right.  And I should know better than to engage in 
speculation like that and possibly cause us to be inundated by 
proponents of SCMfoo, most of whom will never write a line of code for 
postgres let alone ever have to commit anything ;-) Pardon my weakness.

cheers

andrew




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: distributed performance testing
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: DROP OWNED BY