Re: distributed performance testing - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: distributed performance testing
Date
Msg-id 26323.1123972198@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to distributed performance testing  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: distributed performance testing  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Re: distributed performance testing  ("Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> Incidentally,  use of a different SCM system might well make 
> constructing test sets more simple. Imagine, say, in SVN, you would 
> create a branch called "test-set-yyyy-mm-dd" or some such, make your 
> changes there, add a test script under some well known name, and commit 
> the branch.

This seems a pretty unconvincing argument for SVN ... we could perfectly
well do that in CVS, no?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: gettime() - a timeofday() alternative
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: distributed performance testing