So, are we going to go with 90% or 95% as the assumed assumption for a
warning :)
Yann Michel wrote:
>>I'd like to avoid a GUC for "percent_full_warning" if we can. Can anyone
>>see a way around this? Should we just assume 90% full?
>>
>>
>
>Well, it was only an idea of not leaving the admin out in the rain but
>giving im a hint by time of what might happen if there was no action. I
>have absolutely no idea if it is usefull of introducing a new GUC or
>setting this value to a fixed size of 90 or whatever percent. Maybe 95
>percent are enough, too?
>
>Regards,
>Yann
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
>
