Re: Gist Recovery testing - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Gist Recovery testing
Date
Msg-id 28437.1118759463@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Gist Recovery testing  (Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru>)
List pgsql-hackers
Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru> writes:
>> Rather than eating up the extra flag bit, though, would it be possible
>> to change the tuple to appear to contain a NULL?

> We would like to preserve NULL as non-special value because we hope to add 
> support of NULLs to GiST, although it's of low priority.

Fair enough.

> In other side, IndexTupleData contains ItemPointerData which contains
> block number and offset.  GiST doesn't use offset on inner pages (on
> leaf pages, ItemPointerData points to heap tuple), it always equal
> FirstOffsetNumber. So I can use offset to indicate correctness of
> tuple's key...

OK, that's a tad klugy but I agree with the approach.  I'd like to
preserve the spare flag bit in IndexTuple->t_info --- we might need
that someday.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "John Hansen"
Date:
Subject: Re: PG_FREE_IF_COPY()
Next
From: "Jonah H. Harris"
Date:
Subject: Re: User Quota Implementation