-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
> I'm gonna disagree here. I think that not having a postgresql inc to go
> to means that by the time postgresql becomes ubiquitous, it will be like
> apache. no company behind it, every company using it.
That's not entirely accurate. Apache has had lots of help from IBM, as well
as a few other very large companies.
> No need for a postgresql inc to do that, just time, good code, and
> knowledgable DBAs choosing it more and more often.
Sorry, but technical prowess alone is no recipe for success in today's
marketplace. Things are more complex than that.
- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200404272007
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iD8DBQFAjvXFvJuQZxSWSsgRAjQoAJ4mcK3KHut1zzwFqqbXEUKXBv1i9QCgsdfX
2uftNhAts2CTAEpKmclW4cE=
=ZaY3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
