Re: Autoconf update? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Christopher Kings-Lynne
Subject Re: Autoconf update?
Date
Msg-id 429BC2A5.904@familyhealth.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Autoconf update?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> Well, it'll still be necessary to keep 2.53 around, unless you want to
> move to 2.59 for future releases of the back branches too ... which
> might be OK, I'm not sure.

I thought it was to help the public not have to keep so many versions 
around :)

Chris



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: A 2 phase commit weirdness
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Consumer-grade vs enterprise-grade disk drives