Re: Autoconf update? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Autoconf update?
Date
Msg-id 24991.1117476842@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Autoconf update?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: Autoconf update?  (Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> Does anyone object if we moved to Autoconf 2.59?  It's been the last 
> release for 18 months now, so it seems reasonable to settle on it.  I'm 
> not actually looking to use features from there, but it gets a bit 
> annoying to have to keep so many Autoconf versions around.

Well, it'll still be necessary to keep 2.53 around, unless you want to
move to 2.59 for future releases of the back branches too ... which
might be OK, I'm not sure.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Fix for cross compilation
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Backslash handling in strings