Re: Signed vs Unsigned (take 2) (src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fujii Masao
Subject Re: Signed vs Unsigned (take 2) (src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c)
Date
Msg-id 4289265f-69e9-0edf-914c-cbddfe83d380@oss.nttdata.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Signed vs Unsigned (take 2) (src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c)  (Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Signed vs Unsigned (take 2) (src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c)  (Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers

On 2021/09/15 21:27, Ranier Vilela wrote:
>     I found this in the commit log in the patch. I agree that these patches
>     are refactoring ones. But I'm thinking that it's worth doing back-patch,
>     to make future back-patching easy. Thought?
> 
> Thanks for picking this.

Pushed. Thanks!

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: improve pg_receivewal code
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Added schema level support for publication.