Re: Views, views, views: Summary of Arguments - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: Views, views, views: Summary of Arguments
Date
Msg-id 4284C135.4080507@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Views, views, views: Summary of Arguments  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:

>"Merlin Moncure" <merlin.moncure@rcsonline.com> writes:
>  
>
>>However, I think PostgreSQL has a fairly serious security problem in
>>that the system catalogs are open to the public.  I don't seem to be
>>winning many supporters on this particular point though.
>>    
>>
>
>No, you're not, and it's not like we've never heard this argument
>before.
>
>Just upthread there were several complaints about the information_schema
>being too restrictive to be useful --- I think we'd get a whole lot more
>of that if we tried to prevent direct examination of the catalogs.
>
>
>  
>

There is a case for a facility to "harden" postgres. My experiments some 
time ago show you can pretty much hide everything without breaking 
anything badly if you're careful. I have it on my personal TODO list to 
complete a hardening script - although I have no idea when I'll get to it.

cheers

andrew


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Views, views, views: Summary of Arguments
Next
From: "Merlin Moncure"
Date:
Subject: Re: Views, views, views: Summary of Arguments