>
> Personally, this is a problem. It's another 2 months away. In that time, I think we
> also need to focus on getting rid of gborg and redirecting people to pgFoundry.
> But can the current setup handle the load, and can we get the move from gborg done?
> Also is the upgrade path for moving servers easy, if it is it's probably more reason to
> push for the full closure of gborg.
Gborg is considered deprecated. The projects that are there may or may
not move. Although the goal it to get them to.
Also at this point Gborg has nothing to do with the initial question. I
am not asking about Gborg. I am asking why we are not placed PostgreSQL
at the core of what is supposed to be the PostgreSQL Projects website,
pgFoundry.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
Command Prompt, Inc.
>
>
> Now, despite the apparent large number of complaints. I think pgFoundry is a very good
> idea, and will work well in the long run. I just think we need to get some things going
> well to get people on the site more. Once that happens, people will instinctively look there.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Russell Smith
--
Your PostgreSQL solutions company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Programming, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedication Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/
