Josh Berkus wrote:
> PG hackers,
[snip]
> What We Need From Hackers --------------------------------------
> (other than patch approval, that is) As stated above, these system
> views, once incorporated into a pg distribution, are likely to be
> with us *forever*. As such, we really can't afford to do major
> refactoring of the column names and structure once they're released.
> So it's really, really, important for everyone on hackers to look
> over the definitions below and find stuff that we've missed or
> doesn't make any sense. Also, we'd like to know about 8.1 changes
> that affect these views.
This all looks good to me, from a quick read through. I don't claim to
have examined the details, but the general idea is definitely something
that would be very worth having.
A nice thing to add would be a more human-comprehensible view of the
pg_locks table. I keep meaning to write a view for it myself, but
haven't ever gotten a round tuit.
Tim
--
-----------------------------------------------
Tim Allen tim@proximity.com.au
Proximity Pty Ltd http://www.proximity.com.au/ http://www4.tpg.com.au/users/rita_tim/
