Re: Tablepartitioning: Will it be supported in Future? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From apoc9009@yahoo.de
Subject Re: Tablepartitioning: Will it be supported in Future?
Date
Msg-id 426E0D39.5020001@yahoo.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Tablepartitioning: Will it be supported in Future?  ("Qingqing Zhou" <zhouqq@cs.toronto.edu>)
Responses Re: Tablepartitioning: Will it be supported in Future?
List pgsql-hackers
Ok!
The Links your posted are great and i guessing it will help me a lot!

But the other Question (if Tablepartitioning under Developemt and will 
it be supported generally)
is still alive.

Josh

Qingqing Zhou wrote:

><apoc9009@yahoo.de> writes
>  
>
>>I have done the following Post to PSQL Performance, but Richard Huxton
>>say it
>>might be a better Idea to post it again on you List so i forward the
>>message.
>>    
>>
>...
>  
>
>>It is exiting to see thadt Verison 8.0 has Tablespaces like ORACLE and
>>DB/2,
>>but i need Partitioning on a few very large Tables.
>>    
>>
>...
>
>Richard said you can *search* in this list ...  Here are two links might be
>of your interests:
>
>http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2004-12/msg00101.php  - how
>to do horizonal partition using inheritance;
>
>http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2005-03/msg00370.php - a
>long list of discussing the future partition implementation;
>
>
>Regards,
>Qingqing
>
>
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org
>
>  
>   *





pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Qingqing Zhou"
Date:
Subject: Re: Tablepartitioning: Will it be supported in Future?
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: bitmapscan test, no success, bs is not faster