Re: Draft back-branch release notes are up - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Draft back-branch release notes are up
Date
Msg-id 42640.1620406808@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Draft back-branch release notes are up  (Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com> writes:
> I see similar (if not duplicate) entries for a "COMMIT AND CHAIN"
> issue, committed at nearly the same time, and both by Fujii Masao. Are
> these the same / should they be contained in one entry?

>> +Author: Fujii Masao <fujii@postgresql.org>
>> +Branch: master [8a55cb5ba] 2021-02-19 21:57:52 +0900

>> +Author: Fujii Masao <fujii@postgresql.org>
>> +Branch: master [fe06819f1] 2021-02-19 22:01:25 +0900

No, the first is a server bug, the second is a psql bug.

Thanks for looking though!

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Matthias van de Meent
Date:
Subject: Re: Draft back-branch release notes are up
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Why do we have perl and sed versions of Gen_dummy_probes?