Neil Conway wrote:
> Mark Kirkwood wrote:
>
>> Great that it fixes it... however, I had submitted a tidier patch that
>> puts the macro in the header
>
>
> How is this tidier?
>
err... puts the macro in the header....
> (I don't see a reason for pg_buffercache_pages.h at all, actually.)
>
(chuckles) - well, that puts a different complexion on it, best leave it
as is then! (in fact, feel free to move the declaration from
pg_buffercache_pages.h to pg_buffercache_pages.c, and eliminate the
header altogether)
cheers
Mark
